A.1100A (Bores)/S.3849 (Hoylman-Sigal)

STAFF CONTACT :

Assistant Director, Government Affairs
518.694.4461

BILL

A.1100A (Bores)/S.3849 (Hoylman-Sigal)

SUBJECT

No Cap Act

DATE

Support

Print Friendly PDF

The Business Council supports A.5366 (Bores)/S.3849 (Hoylman-Sigal).

This legislation would repeal the cap on supreme court justices. Currently the formula to determine how many Supreme Court seats in a judicial district is a ratio of 1 justice per 50,000 people. This formula is outdated and has put a great strain on not just the court system but the people and businesses of New York. The court system is seeing a large backlog in cases due to the limited number of justices to oversee court proceedings. This issue was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and as a result attributed to the workforce shortage and housing crisis.

Prolonged court proceedings cost money but more importantly it costs people time. This impacts the rights to a speedy trial for those in criminal proceedings, many of the times these are people that do not have the resources for prolonged court proceedings. Due to the large backlog, those being held on pretrial detention have experienced loss of employment and as a result lead to housing instability. Many courts have attempted to adjust and address this backlog through different methods such the use of virtual court proceedings and court data dashboards. Some have experienced success in clearing portions of the backlog, however, there have been many instances where judges from other lower courts have had to step in to fill vacancies on state supreme courts. This leads to vacancies in the lower courts which has resulted in the backlog of other criminal, civil and family law cases to be added to the backlog.

While civil cases make up only part of the court backlog, their impact on the business community, especially small businesses, is disproportionately severe. Prolonged litigation increases financial strain through higher court costs and ongoing legal fees, which many small businesses are ill-equipped to absorb. For some, these costs can mean the difference between staying open and shutting down. Even those that survive may be forced to reduce operations or cut staff, directly affecting local economies and job stability. Addressing delays in civil proceedings is not just a matter of judicial efficiency, it is an economic imperative that supports business resilience and community employment

Eliminating the cap on supreme court justices and allowing the legislature to adjust the number of justices based on the actual needs of judicial district would be greatly helpful to eliminate the backlog of cases.

For these reasons, The Business Council supports A.1100 (Bores)/S.3849 (Hoylman-Sigal).