|
Policy changes that would reduce the costs of workers’
compensation, health insurance, and liability insurance are
high on The Business Council’s list of legislative priorities
for
the remainder of the 2005 legislative session.
The first on-time budget in two decades will enable legislators
to focus more attention than usual on non-budget issues, said
Business Council President Daniel B. Walsh. The Council will
highlight several legislative priorities in its dialogue with
lawmakers.
The Council’s post-budget priorities include:
Workers’ comp reform: New York’s
workers’ compensation costs on a cost-per-case basis
are the nation’s second-highest, more than 70 percent
above the national average. The Council will continue to urge
lawmakers to enact a variety of reforms to cut these costs.
A key reform would limit the duration of benefits given to
workers with injuries for which benefits are not currently
prescribed by schedule.
The Council is also urging lawmakers to reduce state assessments
that support the workers' comp system's “Second Injury
Fund,” and to change the assessment payment methodology
for self-insured groups. Assessments are surcharges on comp
premiums that pay the expenses of the state’s Workers'
Compensation Board and finance special-purpose funds, such
as the Second Injury Fund.
Liability reform: The Council is pursuing
a number of reforms designed to rein in the costs of lawsuit
abuse in New York State, including:
• Repeal of New York’s antiquated vicarious liability
law, which holds that companies that lease cars to others
can be sued for damages if the lessee gets into an accident—even
if the company leasing the car is blameless.
• Repeal or reform of New York’s unique and notorious
Scaffold Law, which holds that contractors and property-owners
can be held absolutely liable for worksite injuries even if
they have been in no way negligent and even if there is evidence
that the injured worker is to blame.
Replacement power: The Council is urging
lawmakers to extend a state statute that gives western New
York industries access to 445 megawatts of power generated
by the New York Power Authority (NYPA). This relatively inexpensive
power is called “replacement power” because the
allotment was originally made to replace power that had been
generated in that region by a power plant that was destroyed
in a rockslide in 1956.
The state legislature is considering a bill (S.1136-Maziarz/A.2715-Tokasz)
that would do this.
Power for Jobs: The Council is supporting
modifications to the state’s successful Power for Jobs
program, which offers reduced-rate power to employers that
pledge to use it to create or retain jobs. The Council is
hoping to restore to the program the flexibility the New York
Power Authority (NYPA) used to have to extend contracts.
Economic-development power: The Council
is also urging lawmakers to explore other ways to offer reduced-rate
power for economic-development purposes to encourage job creation
in New York State.
Freedom Health Plans: The Council is also
urging lawmakers to pass legislation authorizing insurers
and HMOs to offer “Freedom Health Plans.” These
plans would have higher deductibles and would be coupled with
new health savings accounts (HSAs), accounts in which individuals
can contribute pre-tax income to cover health-care expenses.
The Senate has estimated that these policies would cost about
40 percent less than existing policies.
The legislature is considering a bill that would do this
(S.1405-Seward/A.2688-Morelle).
Unemployment insurance fund financing: The
Business Council and its members are exploring the possibility
of supporting legislation that would automatically trigger
bonding to repay the federal government money that New York
State has borrowed to pay unemployment insurance (UI) benefits
to out-of-work New Yorkers.
Such borrowing is routine, but in recent years, it has been
heavy, and the cost of the borrowing has triggered increases
in employers’ UI insurance costs. There is some belief
that the fund is recovering and will be able to repay the
federal government. Nonetheless, the Council is exploring
legislation that would prompt bonding of the debt automatically
if the fund balance fails to reach a certain threshold by
a certain date.
Plant-siting law: The Council will again
urge lawmakers to extend the former Article X of the state
Public Service Law, which spelled out a mechanism by which
proposed new power plants could be considered. The former
law expired in December of 2002. The absence of a plant-siting
law is widely acknowledged to signal uncertainty to energy
markets and the world’s business community generally
about New York's commitment to a stable energy future.
School standards: The Council again this
year will urge lawmakers and the state Board of Regents to
reject any and all efforts to weaken the state’s academic
standards and standardized tests that measure students’
and schools’ achievements in meeting those standards.
Tax tribunal: The Council supports creation
of a tax tribunal: a new, specialized court that would be
charged with hearing significant disputes over real-property
tax assessments involving businesses and local taxing entities.
When litigation of this sort plays out in the mainstream court
system, the cases can last for a decade or more, which hurts
both employers and localities.
Outsourcing: The Council will continue to
monitor legislative proposals that address the movement of
jobs and investment across borders, and to staunchly oppose
bills that would inappropriately limit the normal ebb and
flow of commerce in the name of slowing “outsourcing”
of jobs.
The Council has long maintained that lawmakers should focus
on remedying state policies that have kept New York’s
job-creation costs high and that have kept New York’s
short- and long-term growth rate so far behind the national
average for many decades.
Procurement: The Council will monitor bills
that would alter the way the state buys goods and services
with an eye to ensuring that no needless restrictions on normal
commercial activities are imposed.
‘Breach of security’ bills:
The Council is monitoring several proposals related to employers’
obligations if employers’ data bases are hacked for
customer information. For example, the Council is opposing
one bill (A.5487-Brodsky) designed to punish employers whose
data bases are invaded even if there is no evidence of employer
wrongdoing.
Licensing of occupational safety and professionals:
The Council is supporting legislation (S.3583-Alesse/A.3309-Morelle)
to require the licensing of these professionals. Licensing
of individuals who perform industrial hygiene and safety services
would make it harder for unqualified individuals to represent
themselves as qualified to offer these services. Licensing
can help ensure that individuals charged with protecting workers
should have minimal training and experience.
|