PRIORITY
ISSUE: Power
For Jobs
Status:
The final budget agreement included a one year extender of the Power for Jobs program, through 12/31/06. (See Part P of S.3669/A.6843). This legislation also authorizes another $75 million in financial support from NYPA for the PfJ program during Fiscal 2006; and allows any power for jobs recipient to choose to receive electricity savings reimbursement as a substitute for a contract extension.
The legislature also approved a comprehensive
power bill (S.5866/Wright-A.8960/Tonko),
that, among other things, restores
flexibility to the Power for Jobs program
by allowing NYPA to consider not only
job-retention statistics but also other "reasonable factors" when
considering extension or reinstatement
of PfJ allocations. The Business Council
supported this language.
• S.5866/A.8960
• TBC's Legislative
memo in support |
Contact:
For more information, contact Ken Pokalsky via e-mail at ken.pokalsky@bcnys.org or
phone at 518/465-7511. |
|
The Business Council supports a continuation of the
Power for Jobs program to help energy intensive and at-risk companies
remain competitive, and help them retain and add to their in-state
employment. Since all current Power for Jobs allocations will expire
by the end of 2005, timely legislative action is essential.
Program Background - The PfJ program
provides reduced cost power to entities that make specific commitments
regarding job retention and growth. About 700 businesses and not-for-profit
organizations have benefited from the program since 1998. Overall,
they account for nearly 300,000 New York State jobs.
PfJ power allocations were initially distributed over a three-year
cycle, with each participant receiving a three year allocation.
Year 1 contracts were extended by three years during the 2000 legislative
session. In the 2002 session, an extender was approved for year
2 and year 3 recipients, and a December 2005 sunset was placed
on the PfJ program. In 2004, all current allocations were extended
until the end of 2005, and participants were given the choice of
contract extensions or a new “rebate” based benefit.
Need for PfJ – The same factors that justified
the original PfJ statute – cost and capacity – continue
to exist today. New York needs a program to provide lower cost
power to energy-intensive industrial power customers – those
with power demand of 100 KW or higher – that are at greatest
risk of relocating or closing down.
Costs – While average industrial prices of 5.9 cents per
kilowatt hour is only slightly above the national average, that
figure reflects the beneficial impact of NYPA hydro power going
to major industrial users. Without NYPA hydro power, the average
industrial rate in New York rises to nearly 8 cents/kwh. Average
rates for commercial users are even higher – at 11.6 cents/kwh,
more than 54 percent above the national average.
Capacity -- Based on projected demand growth and the need for
surplus generating capacity to support system reliability and price
competition, The Business Council estimates a need for 9,200 MW
of additional generating capacity by 2007. In May, 2004 the state
ISO reported that, while approximately 3,000 megawatts of power
have been installed in New York since 2001, several thousand more
megawatts are needed to maintain reliability of the electric system.
Program Financing – Under the PfJ program,
energy cost reductions come from several sources: the use of price-subsidized
NYPA power, through competitive bidding for bulk power purchases,
and through reduced charges by local power distribution companies
(whose reduced revenues are offset by credits against their state
utility gross receipts tax, or GRT, liability.)
Total PfJ program cost from 1998 through its current December ‘05
expiration date is estimated at $450 million, with about two-thirds
of the costs coming from GRT credits, and the remainder through
NYPA power discounts.
Executive Budget Proposal – The Business
Council supports the additional one-year extension proposed in
the FY 06 Executive Budget. Longer term, we recommend that the
PfJ program – or an alternative program – focus on
providing benefits to expanding and at-risk industrial and commercial
customers for whom power costs are an essential competitiveness
factor.