|
This bill would amend Sections 704 and 706 the Labor law and prohibit employers
from hiring permanent replacement workers during a lawful strike or lockout.
It would also authorize backpay and other remedies to affected strikers.
The Business Council opposes this bill because it:
Interferes with the collective bargaining balance
For decades, a balance in collective bargaining influence has been maintained
between employers and employee unions because employees had the right to
withhold their services through a strike and employers had the right to
continue the operation of their business through the hiring of temporary
or permanent replacement workers. This balance kept bargaining a serious
business between the two parties and pressured each side to come to an
agreement, knowing the consequences if a strike or lockout was the outcome
of failed bargaining. Just as the right to strike is the union’s
principal tool to pressure an employer to reach an agreement, the right
to permanently replace striking workers is the employer’s only tool
to counter such pressure.
Encourages surface bargaining
This bill, while claiming to correct an imbalance in collective bargaining,
will, in fact, penalize employers for simply taking actions that have been
legal for decades. Rather that correcting an imbalance in collective bargaining,
it would destroy any balance in collective bargaining existing between
the parties. With pressure off of the union and its members to seriously
negotiate and compromise during a strike, delay and surface bargaining
would be the strategy used to get what they want. There would simply be
no serious economic consequence to the union and its members for doing
otherwise.
Prohibiting an employer from permanently replacing striking workers would
destroy the delicate labor relations balance that has existed for decades
and seriously impair the ability of an employer to do business in New York
State.
For these reasons, The Business Council opposes this legislation and respectfully
urges that it not be reported by the Senate Labor Committee.
|